SEBA-949 support for publishing bbsim events on kafka
Change-Id: I4354cd026bbadc801e4d6d08b2f9cd3462917b4c
diff --git a/vendor/gopkg.in/jcmturner/gokrb5.v7/types/AuthorizationData.go b/vendor/gopkg.in/jcmturner/gokrb5.v7/types/AuthorizationData.go
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c944800
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/gopkg.in/jcmturner/gokrb5.v7/types/AuthorizationData.go
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+package types
+
+import (
+ "github.com/jcmturner/gofork/encoding/asn1"
+)
+
+// Reference: https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4120.txt
+// Section: 5.2.6
+
+/*
+AuthorizationData
+
+-- NOTE: AuthorizationData is always used as an OPTIONAL field and
+-- should not be empty.
+AuthorizationData ::= SEQUENCE OF SEQUENCE {
+ad-type [0] Int32,
+ad-data [1] OCTET STRING
+}
+
+ad-data
+This field contains authorization data to be interpreted according
+to the value of the corresponding ad-type field.
+
+ad-type
+ This field specifies the format for the ad-data subfield. All
+negative values are reserved for local use. Non-negative values
+are reserved for registered use.
+
+Each sequence of type and data is referred to as an authorization
+element. Elements MAY be application specific; however, there is a
+common set of recursive elements that should be understood by all
+implementations. These elements contain other elements embedded
+within them, and the interpretation of the encapsulating element
+determines which of the embedded elements must be interpreted, and
+which may be ignored.
+
+These common authorization data elements are recursively defined,
+meaning that the ad-data for these types will itself contain a
+sequence of authorization data whose interpretation is affected by
+the encapsulating element. Depending on the meaning of the
+encapsulating element, the encapsulated elements may be ignored,
+might be interpreted as issued directly by the KDC, or might be
+stored in a separate plaintext part of the ticket. The types of the
+encapsulating elements are specified as part of the Kerberos
+specification because the behavior based on these values should be
+understood across implementations, whereas other elements need only
+be understood by the applications that they affect.
+
+Authorization data elements are considered critical if present in a
+ticket or authenticator. If an unknown authorization data element
+type is received by a server either in an AP-REQ or in a ticket
+contained in an AP-REQ, then, unless it is encapsulated in a known
+authorization data element amending the criticality of the elements
+it contains, authentication MUST fail. Authorization data is
+intended to restrict the use of a ticket. If the service cannot
+determine whether the restriction applies to that service, then a
+security weakness may result if the ticket can be used for that
+service. Authorization elements that are optional can be enclosed in
+an AD-IF-RELEVANT element.
+
+In the definitions that follow, the value of the ad-type for the
+element will be specified as the least significant part of the
+subsection number, and the value of the ad-data will be as shown in
+the ASN.1 structure that follows the subsection heading.
+
+ Contents of ad-data ad-type
+
+ DER encoding of AD-IF-RELEVANT 1
+
+ DER encoding of AD-KDCIssued 4
+
+ DER encoding of AD-AND-OR 5
+
+ DER encoding of AD-MANDATORY-FOR-KDC 8
+
+*/
+
+// AuthorizationData implements RFC 4120 type: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4120#section-5.2.6
+type AuthorizationData []AuthorizationDataEntry
+
+// AuthorizationDataEntry implements RFC 4120 type: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4120#section-5.2.6
+type AuthorizationDataEntry struct {
+ ADType int32 `asn1:"explicit,tag:0"`
+ ADData []byte `asn1:"explicit,tag:1"`
+}
+
+// ADIfRelevant implements RFC 4120 type: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4120#section-5.2.6.1
+type ADIfRelevant AuthorizationData
+
+// ADKDCIssued implements RFC 4120 type: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4120#section-5.2.6.2
+type ADKDCIssued struct {
+ ADChecksum Checksum `asn1:"explicit,tag:0"`
+ IRealm string `asn1:"optional,generalstring,explicit,tag:1"`
+ Isname PrincipalName `asn1:"optional,explicit,tag:2"`
+ Elements AuthorizationData `asn1:"explicit,tag:3"`
+}
+
+// ADAndOr implements RFC 4120 type: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4120#section-5.2.6.3
+type ADAndOr struct {
+ ConditionCount int32 `asn1:"explicit,tag:0"`
+ Elements AuthorizationData `asn1:"explicit,tag:1"`
+}
+
+// ADMandatoryForKDC implements RFC 4120 type: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4120#section-5.2.6.4
+type ADMandatoryForKDC AuthorizationData
+
+// Unmarshal bytes into the ADKDCIssued.
+func (a *ADKDCIssued) Unmarshal(b []byte) error {
+ _, err := asn1.Unmarshal(b, a)
+ return err
+}
+
+// Unmarshal bytes into the AuthorizationData.
+func (a *AuthorizationData) Unmarshal(b []byte) error {
+ _, err := asn1.Unmarshal(b, a)
+ return err
+}
+
+// Unmarshal bytes into the AuthorizationDataEntry.
+func (a *AuthorizationDataEntry) Unmarshal(b []byte) error {
+ _, err := asn1.Unmarshal(b, a)
+ return err
+}