tree: faac517930d922befbf34842cb293569b7f6ed4a [path history] [tgz]
  1. .gitignore
  2. .gitreview
  3. LICENSE
  4. Makefile
  5. README.md
  6. VERSION
  7. generated/
  8. go.mod
  9. go.sum
  10. layers.go
  11. layers_test.go
  12. mebase.go
  13. mebase_test.go
  14. meframe.go
  15. meframe_test.go
  16. messagetypes.go
  17. messagetypes_test.go
  18. omci.go
  19. omci_test.go
  20. vendor/
README.md

OMCI

OMCI gopacket library supports the encoding and decoding of ITU G.988 OMCI messages.

Message Types supported and under unit test

The following OMCI message types currently have been coded and are covered satisfactory by unit tests.

  • CreateRequest
  • CreateResponse
  • DeleteRequest
  • DeleteResponse
  • SetRequest
  • GetRequest
  • GetAllAlarmsRequest
  • GetAllAlarmsResponse
  • GetAllAlarmsNextRequest
  • MibUploadRequest
  • MibUploadResponse
  • MibUploadNextRequest
  • MibResetRequest
  • MibResetResponse
  • SynchronizeTimeRequest

Message Types supported but lacking full unit test

The following OMCI message types currently have been coded and are partially covered by unit tests, but work still remains for sufficient/better unit test coverage.

  • SetResponse
  • GetResponse
  • GetAllAlarmsNextResponse
  • MibUploadNextResponse
  • SynchronizeTimeResponse
  • AttributeValueChange
  • RebootRequest
  • RebootResponse
  • StartSoftwareDownloadRequest
  • GetNextRequest
  • GetNextResponse

Message Types supported but lacking any unit test

The following OMCI message types currently have been coded but do not have any unit test coverage.

  • StartSoftwareDownloadResponse
  • DownloadSectionRequest
  • DownloadSectionResponse
  • EndSoftwareDownloadRequest
  • EndSoftwareDownloadResponse
  • ActivateSoftwareRequest
  • ActivateSoftwareResponse
  • CommitSoftwareRequest
  • CommitSoftwareResponse
  • GetCurrentDataRequest
  • GetCurrentDataResponse
  • AlarmNotification

Message Types not yet supported

The following OMCI message types currently have not been coded.

  • TestResult
  • TestRequest
  • TestResponse
  • SetTableRequest
  • SetTableResponse

Current user-test coverage

The coverage.sh and coverage.cmd scripts can be used to create code coverage support for the library. The current coverage (as of 2/11/2020) is:

FileStatement Coverage
layers.go100%
mebase.go87.5%
meframe.go54.8%
messagetypes.go48.1%
omci.go81.6%

Other outstanding items

Besides OMCI Message decode/serialization, and associated unit tests, the following items would be needed or useful in a first official release of this library. Some changes are to be done in the generated OMCI ME code as well.

  • Specific examples of how to use this library (expand upon DecodeEncode.go examples) Include unknown ME examples and how to catch various common or expected errors. Until this is available, please take a look at how this library is used in my onumock. There is a utilities subdirectory in the onumock project that has some examples. One is a very crude OLT simulator that I wrote to help test the ONU Mock.
  • Support optional msg-types. (This was very recently fixed in the code generator).
  • Constraint checking (these are not yet fully parsed/provided by the OMCI code generated structs). This feature will hopefully be available in the near future.
  • Add Alarm Table Support (generated MEs also)
  • Add AVC flag for appropriate attributes
  • Support of the extended message format
  • For serialization, check early for message size exceeded
  • Add some type of logging support

The following would be 'nice' to have but are not necessary for initial code release

  • Extended message support
  • MIC Encode/Decode support

Also searching through the code for TODO statements will also yeild additional areas of work to be performed.

What is not provided by this library

This library is not a full OMCI stack for either an OLT or an ONU. It is focused primarily on packet decode/serialization and a variety of structs and functions that are useful for handling the creation of OMCI frames and handling decoded frames from the PON.

For an OLT-side OMCI stack, you would still need to write:

  • OMCI CC sender & receiver with appropriate timeout support
  • OLT State machines to support
    • MIB Uploads/Audits/Resynchronization (and a MIB database implemention),
    • More sophisticated get & get-next support to make handle of MEs with lots of attributes or table attributes easy to handle and code,
    • Alarm Table support,
    • OMCI ME/Msg-Type capabilities inquiry,
    • Performance Monitoring collection (and initial time synchronization),
    • Service implementation

For an ONU-side OMCI stack, you would still need to write:

  • OMCC implementation,
  • MIB Database,
  • Get-Next cache for table attributes,
  • MIB upload next cache for MIB uploads,
  • Generation of any alarms/AVC notifications,
  • Actually acting on the create/delete/get/set/... requests from an OLT