[ospfd] Fix bug in 'passive-interface default' behavior
2007-04-21 Andrew J. Schorr <ajschorr@alumni.princeton.edu>
* ospf_interface.c: (ospf_if_set_multicast) Fix bug: was testing
interface passive status improperly in light of the recent
'passive-interface default' patch. Now need to test
OSPF_IF_PASSIVE_STATUS(oi) instead of
OSPF_IF_PARAM(oi, passive_interface).
diff --git a/ospfd/ChangeLog b/ospfd/ChangeLog
index 654c31a..610eadb 100644
--- a/ospfd/ChangeLog
+++ b/ospfd/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+2007-04-21 Andrew J. Schorr <ajschorr@alumni.princeton.edu>
+
+ * ospf_interface.c: (ospf_if_set_multicast) Fix bug: was testing
+ interface passive status improperly in light of the recent
+ 'passive-interface default' patch. Now need to test
+ OSPF_IF_PASSIVE_STATUS(oi) instead of
+ OSPF_IF_PARAM(oi, passive_interface).
+
2007-03-23 Paul Jakma <paul.jakma@sun.com>
* ospf_spf.c: (various) Add more debug statements.
diff --git a/ospfd/ospf_interface.c b/ospfd/ospf_interface.c
index 4b6b424..bf53668 100644
--- a/ospfd/ospf_interface.c
+++ b/ospfd/ospf_interface.c
@@ -717,7 +717,7 @@
if ((oi->state > ISM_Loopback) &&
(oi->type != OSPF_IFTYPE_LOOPBACK) &&
(oi->type != OSPF_IFTYPE_VIRTUALLINK) &&
- (OSPF_IF_PARAM(oi, passive_interface) == OSPF_IF_ACTIVE))
+ (OSPF_IF_PASSIVE_STATUS(oi) == OSPF_IF_ACTIVE))
{
/* The interface should belong to the OSPF-all-routers group. */
if (!OI_MEMBER_CHECK(oi, MEMBER_ALLROUTERS) &&
@@ -745,7 +745,7 @@
if (((oi->type == OSPF_IFTYPE_BROADCAST) ||
(oi->type == OSPF_IFTYPE_POINTOPOINT)) &&
((oi->state == ISM_DR) || (oi->state == ISM_Backup)) &&
- (OSPF_IF_PARAM(oi, passive_interface) == OSPF_IF_ACTIVE))
+ (OSPF_IF_PASSIVE_STATUS(oi) == OSPF_IF_ACTIVE))
{
/* The interface should belong to the OSPF-designated-routers group. */
if (!OI_MEMBER_CHECK(oi, MEMBER_DROUTERS) &&