2005-10-18 Paul Jakma <paul.jakma@sun.com>
* (general) SPF memory management cleanup and fix for rare
double-free bug.
* ospf_spf.h: (struct vertex_parent) New struct to hold parent
specific data, eg the backlink and the parent vertex pointer,
and point to the appropriate general struct vertex_nexthop.
(struct vertex_nexthop) remove parent vertex pointer, so
this struct can be shared across vertices.
(struct vertex) rename list child to list children. Remove
list of nexthops, replace with list of vertex_parents.
* ospf_spf.c: (update_stat) trivial, remove cast from void *.
(vertex_nexthop_new) remove init of parent - field is gone
from struct vertex_nexthop.
(ospf_canonical_nexthops_free) Remove the canonical
vertex_nexthop memory objects. These are the vertex_nexthops
attached to the first level of router vertices from the root.
(vertex_parent_new) new function, create a vertex_parent.
(vertex_parent_free) ditto, but free it.
(ospf_vertex_new) Update to match changes to struct vertex.
(ospf_vertex_free) Recursively free a struct vertex and its
children. The parent list is used as a reference count.
vertex_nexthops must be free seperately, if required.
(ospf_vertex_dump) update to match struct vertex changes.
Print out backlink of parents too.
(ospf_vertex_add_parent) ditto.
(ospf_lsa_has_link) update comment.
(ospf_nexthop_add_unique) removed, not needed anymore.
(ospf_nexthop_merge) ditto.
(ospf_spf_consider_nexthop) renamed to ospf_spf_add_parent.
Simplified to just create vertex_parent and add it.
(ospf_spf_flush_parents) new function, flush out the parent
list.
(ospf_nexthop_calculation) Take the relevant route_lsa_link
as an argument, which simplifies things and removes the need
for the hack in ospf_nexthop_add_unique - ospf_spf_next
already knew exactly which link the cost calculated was for.
Update to match struct vertex changes too.
(ospf_spf_next) Don't create a vertex for W unnecessarily, if
it's there's a vertex already created for W, use it, and
hence there's no need to free it either.
Update some manipulation/comparisons of distance to match.
Flush the parent list if a lower cost path is found.
(ospf_spf_route_free) unused, removed.
(ospf_spf_dump) match the struct vertex changes, and dump the
ifname if possible.
(ospf_spf_calculate) At end of SPF, free the canonical nexthops
and call ospf_vertex_free on the root vertex to free the
entire tree.
* ospf_interface.c: (ospf_vl_set_params) match struct vertex
changes.
* ospf_route.c: (ospf_intra_route_add) ditto
(ospf_route_copy_nexthops_from_vertex) ditto
* memtypes.c: (memory_list_ospf) Add MTYPE_OSPF_VERTEX_PARENT.
diff --git a/ospfd/ospf_interface.c b/ospfd/ospf_interface.c
index 9d31b7a..fe32268 100644
--- a/ospfd/ospf_interface.c
+++ b/ospfd/ospf_interface.c
@@ -999,7 +999,7 @@
int changed = 0;
struct ospf_interface *voi;
struct listnode *node;
- struct vertex_nexthop *nh;
+ struct vertex_parent *vp = NULL;
int i;
struct router_lsa *rl;
@@ -1012,9 +1012,9 @@
changed = 1;
}
- for (ALL_LIST_ELEMENTS_RO (v->nexthop, node, nh))
+ for (ALL_LIST_ELEMENTS_RO (v->parents, node, vp))
{
- vl_data->out_oi = (struct ospf_interface *) nh->oi;
+ vl_data->out_oi = vp->nexthop->oi;
if (!IPV4_ADDR_SAME(&voi->address->u.prefix4,
&vl_data->out_oi->address->u.prefix4))
@@ -1031,12 +1031,12 @@
/* use SPF determined backlink index in struct vertex
* for virtual link destination address
*/
- if (v->backlink >= 0)
+ if (vp && vp->backlink >= 0)
{
if (!IPV4_ADDR_SAME (&vl_data->peer_addr,
- &rl->link[v->backlink].link_data))
+ &rl->link[vp->backlink].link_data))
changed = 1;
- vl_data->peer_addr = rl->link[v->backlink].link_data;
+ vl_data->peer_addr = rl->link[vp->backlink].link_data;
}
else
{