[VOL-4291] Rw-core updates for gRPC migration
Change-Id: I8d5a554409115b29318089671ca4e1ab3fa98810
diff --git a/vendor/google.golang.org/protobuf/types/known/fieldmaskpb/field_mask.pb.go b/vendor/google.golang.org/protobuf/types/known/fieldmaskpb/field_mask.pb.go
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7f94443
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/google.golang.org/protobuf/types/known/fieldmaskpb/field_mask.pb.go
@@ -0,0 +1,591 @@
+// Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format
+// Copyright 2008 Google Inc. All rights reserved.
+// https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+// * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+
+// Code generated by protoc-gen-go. DO NOT EDIT.
+// source: google/protobuf/field_mask.proto
+
+// Package fieldmaskpb contains generated types for google/protobuf/field_mask.proto.
+//
+// The FieldMask message represents a set of symbolic field paths.
+// The paths are specific to some target message type,
+// which is not stored within the FieldMask message itself.
+//
+//
+// Constructing a FieldMask
+//
+// The New function is used construct a FieldMask:
+//
+// var messageType *descriptorpb.DescriptorProto
+// fm, err := fieldmaskpb.New(messageType, "field.name", "field.number")
+// if err != nil {
+// ... // handle error
+// }
+// ... // make use of fm
+//
+// The "field.name" and "field.number" paths are valid paths according to the
+// google.protobuf.DescriptorProto message. Use of a path that does not correlate
+// to valid fields reachable from DescriptorProto would result in an error.
+//
+// Once a FieldMask message has been constructed,
+// the Append method can be used to insert additional paths to the path set:
+//
+// var messageType *descriptorpb.DescriptorProto
+// if err := fm.Append(messageType, "options"); err != nil {
+// ... // handle error
+// }
+//
+//
+// Type checking a FieldMask
+//
+// In order to verify that a FieldMask represents a set of fields that are
+// reachable from some target message type, use the IsValid method:
+//
+// var messageType *descriptorpb.DescriptorProto
+// if fm.IsValid(messageType) {
+// ... // make use of fm
+// }
+//
+// IsValid needs to be passed the target message type as an input since the
+// FieldMask message itself does not store the message type that the set of paths
+// are for.
+package fieldmaskpb
+
+import (
+ proto "google.golang.org/protobuf/proto"
+ protoreflect "google.golang.org/protobuf/reflect/protoreflect"
+ protoimpl "google.golang.org/protobuf/runtime/protoimpl"
+ reflect "reflect"
+ sort "sort"
+ strings "strings"
+ sync "sync"
+)
+
+// `FieldMask` represents a set of symbolic field paths, for example:
+//
+// paths: "f.a"
+// paths: "f.b.d"
+//
+// Here `f` represents a field in some root message, `a` and `b`
+// fields in the message found in `f`, and `d` a field found in the
+// message in `f.b`.
+//
+// Field masks are used to specify a subset of fields that should be
+// returned by a get operation or modified by an update operation.
+// Field masks also have a custom JSON encoding (see below).
+//
+// # Field Masks in Projections
+//
+// When used in the context of a projection, a response message or
+// sub-message is filtered by the API to only contain those fields as
+// specified in the mask. For example, if the mask in the previous
+// example is applied to a response message as follows:
+//
+// f {
+// a : 22
+// b {
+// d : 1
+// x : 2
+// }
+// y : 13
+// }
+// z: 8
+//
+// The result will not contain specific values for fields x,y and z
+// (their value will be set to the default, and omitted in proto text
+// output):
+//
+//
+// f {
+// a : 22
+// b {
+// d : 1
+// }
+// }
+//
+// A repeated field is not allowed except at the last position of a
+// paths string.
+//
+// If a FieldMask object is not present in a get operation, the
+// operation applies to all fields (as if a FieldMask of all fields
+// had been specified).
+//
+// Note that a field mask does not necessarily apply to the
+// top-level response message. In case of a REST get operation, the
+// field mask applies directly to the response, but in case of a REST
+// list operation, the mask instead applies to each individual message
+// in the returned resource list. In case of a REST custom method,
+// other definitions may be used. Where the mask applies will be
+// clearly documented together with its declaration in the API. In
+// any case, the effect on the returned resource/resources is required
+// behavior for APIs.
+//
+// # Field Masks in Update Operations
+//
+// A field mask in update operations specifies which fields of the
+// targeted resource are going to be updated. The API is required
+// to only change the values of the fields as specified in the mask
+// and leave the others untouched. If a resource is passed in to
+// describe the updated values, the API ignores the values of all
+// fields not covered by the mask.
+//
+// If a repeated field is specified for an update operation, new values will
+// be appended to the existing repeated field in the target resource. Note that
+// a repeated field is only allowed in the last position of a `paths` string.
+//
+// If a sub-message is specified in the last position of the field mask for an
+// update operation, then new value will be merged into the existing sub-message
+// in the target resource.
+//
+// For example, given the target message:
+//
+// f {
+// b {
+// d: 1
+// x: 2
+// }
+// c: [1]
+// }
+//
+// And an update message:
+//
+// f {
+// b {
+// d: 10
+// }
+// c: [2]
+// }
+//
+// then if the field mask is:
+//
+// paths: ["f.b", "f.c"]
+//
+// then the result will be:
+//
+// f {
+// b {
+// d: 10
+// x: 2
+// }
+// c: [1, 2]
+// }
+//
+// An implementation may provide options to override this default behavior for
+// repeated and message fields.
+//
+// In order to reset a field's value to the default, the field must
+// be in the mask and set to the default value in the provided resource.
+// Hence, in order to reset all fields of a resource, provide a default
+// instance of the resource and set all fields in the mask, or do
+// not provide a mask as described below.
+//
+// If a field mask is not present on update, the operation applies to
+// all fields (as if a field mask of all fields has been specified).
+// Note that in the presence of schema evolution, this may mean that
+// fields the client does not know and has therefore not filled into
+// the request will be reset to their default. If this is unwanted
+// behavior, a specific service may require a client to always specify
+// a field mask, producing an error if not.
+//
+// As with get operations, the location of the resource which
+// describes the updated values in the request message depends on the
+// operation kind. In any case, the effect of the field mask is
+// required to be honored by the API.
+//
+// ## Considerations for HTTP REST
+//
+// The HTTP kind of an update operation which uses a field mask must
+// be set to PATCH instead of PUT in order to satisfy HTTP semantics
+// (PUT must only be used for full updates).
+//
+// # JSON Encoding of Field Masks
+//
+// In JSON, a field mask is encoded as a single string where paths are
+// separated by a comma. Fields name in each path are converted
+// to/from lower-camel naming conventions.
+//
+// As an example, consider the following message declarations:
+//
+// message Profile {
+// User user = 1;
+// Photo photo = 2;
+// }
+// message User {
+// string display_name = 1;
+// string address = 2;
+// }
+//
+// In proto a field mask for `Profile` may look as such:
+//
+// mask {
+// paths: "user.display_name"
+// paths: "photo"
+// }
+//
+// In JSON, the same mask is represented as below:
+//
+// {
+// mask: "user.displayName,photo"
+// }
+//
+// # Field Masks and Oneof Fields
+//
+// Field masks treat fields in oneofs just as regular fields. Consider the
+// following message:
+//
+// message SampleMessage {
+// oneof test_oneof {
+// string name = 4;
+// SubMessage sub_message = 9;
+// }
+// }
+//
+// The field mask can be:
+//
+// mask {
+// paths: "name"
+// }
+//
+// Or:
+//
+// mask {
+// paths: "sub_message"
+// }
+//
+// Note that oneof type names ("test_oneof" in this case) cannot be used in
+// paths.
+//
+// ## Field Mask Verification
+//
+// The implementation of any API method which has a FieldMask type field in the
+// request should verify the included field paths, and return an
+// `INVALID_ARGUMENT` error if any path is unmappable.
+type FieldMask struct {
+ state protoimpl.MessageState
+ sizeCache protoimpl.SizeCache
+ unknownFields protoimpl.UnknownFields
+
+ // The set of field mask paths.
+ Paths []string `protobuf:"bytes,1,rep,name=paths,proto3" json:"paths,omitempty"`
+}
+
+// New constructs a field mask from a list of paths and verifies that
+// each one is valid according to the specified message type.
+func New(m proto.Message, paths ...string) (*FieldMask, error) {
+ x := new(FieldMask)
+ return x, x.Append(m, paths...)
+}
+
+// Union returns the union of all the paths in the input field masks.
+func Union(mx *FieldMask, my *FieldMask, ms ...*FieldMask) *FieldMask {
+ var out []string
+ out = append(out, mx.GetPaths()...)
+ out = append(out, my.GetPaths()...)
+ for _, m := range ms {
+ out = append(out, m.GetPaths()...)
+ }
+ return &FieldMask{Paths: normalizePaths(out)}
+}
+
+// Intersect returns the intersection of all the paths in the input field masks.
+func Intersect(mx *FieldMask, my *FieldMask, ms ...*FieldMask) *FieldMask {
+ var ss1, ss2 []string // reused buffers for performance
+ intersect := func(out, in []string) []string {
+ ss1 = normalizePaths(append(ss1[:0], in...))
+ ss2 = normalizePaths(append(ss2[:0], out...))
+ out = out[:0]
+ for i1, i2 := 0, 0; i1 < len(ss1) && i2 < len(ss2); {
+ switch s1, s2 := ss1[i1], ss2[i2]; {
+ case hasPathPrefix(s1, s2):
+ out = append(out, s1)
+ i1++
+ case hasPathPrefix(s2, s1):
+ out = append(out, s2)
+ i2++
+ case lessPath(s1, s2):
+ i1++
+ case lessPath(s2, s1):
+ i2++
+ }
+ }
+ return out
+ }
+
+ out := Union(mx, my, ms...).GetPaths()
+ out = intersect(out, mx.GetPaths())
+ out = intersect(out, my.GetPaths())
+ for _, m := range ms {
+ out = intersect(out, m.GetPaths())
+ }
+ return &FieldMask{Paths: normalizePaths(out)}
+}
+
+// IsValid reports whether all the paths are syntactically valid and
+// refer to known fields in the specified message type.
+// It reports false for a nil FieldMask.
+func (x *FieldMask) IsValid(m proto.Message) bool {
+ paths := x.GetPaths()
+ return x != nil && numValidPaths(m, paths) == len(paths)
+}
+
+// Append appends a list of paths to the mask and verifies that each one
+// is valid according to the specified message type.
+// An invalid path is not appended and breaks insertion of subsequent paths.
+func (x *FieldMask) Append(m proto.Message, paths ...string) error {
+ numValid := numValidPaths(m, paths)
+ x.Paths = append(x.Paths, paths[:numValid]...)
+ paths = paths[numValid:]
+ if len(paths) > 0 {
+ name := m.ProtoReflect().Descriptor().FullName()
+ return protoimpl.X.NewError("invalid path %q for message %q", paths[0], name)
+ }
+ return nil
+}
+
+func numValidPaths(m proto.Message, paths []string) int {
+ md0 := m.ProtoReflect().Descriptor()
+ for i, path := range paths {
+ md := md0
+ if !rangeFields(path, func(field string) bool {
+ // Search the field within the message.
+ if md == nil {
+ return false // not within a message
+ }
+ fd := md.Fields().ByName(protoreflect.Name(field))
+ // The real field name of a group is the message name.
+ if fd == nil {
+ gd := md.Fields().ByName(protoreflect.Name(strings.ToLower(field)))
+ if gd != nil && gd.Kind() == protoreflect.GroupKind && string(gd.Message().Name()) == field {
+ fd = gd
+ }
+ } else if fd.Kind() == protoreflect.GroupKind && string(fd.Message().Name()) != field {
+ fd = nil
+ }
+ if fd == nil {
+ return false // message has does not have this field
+ }
+
+ // Identify the next message to search within.
+ md = fd.Message() // may be nil
+
+ // Repeated fields are only allowed at the last postion.
+ if fd.IsList() || fd.IsMap() {
+ md = nil
+ }
+
+ return true
+ }) {
+ return i
+ }
+ }
+ return len(paths)
+}
+
+// Normalize converts the mask to its canonical form where all paths are sorted
+// and redundant paths are removed.
+func (x *FieldMask) Normalize() {
+ x.Paths = normalizePaths(x.Paths)
+}
+
+func normalizePaths(paths []string) []string {
+ sort.Slice(paths, func(i, j int) bool {
+ return lessPath(paths[i], paths[j])
+ })
+
+ // Elide any path that is a prefix match on the previous.
+ out := paths[:0]
+ for _, path := range paths {
+ if len(out) > 0 && hasPathPrefix(path, out[len(out)-1]) {
+ continue
+ }
+ out = append(out, path)
+ }
+ return out
+}
+
+// hasPathPrefix is like strings.HasPrefix, but further checks for either
+// an exact matche or that the prefix is delimited by a dot.
+func hasPathPrefix(path, prefix string) bool {
+ return strings.HasPrefix(path, prefix) && (len(path) == len(prefix) || path[len(prefix)] == '.')
+}
+
+// lessPath is a lexicographical comparison where dot is specially treated
+// as the smallest symbol.
+func lessPath(x, y string) bool {
+ for i := 0; i < len(x) && i < len(y); i++ {
+ if x[i] != y[i] {
+ return (x[i] - '.') < (y[i] - '.')
+ }
+ }
+ return len(x) < len(y)
+}
+
+// rangeFields is like strings.Split(path, "."), but avoids allocations by
+// iterating over each field in place and calling a iterator function.
+func rangeFields(path string, f func(field string) bool) bool {
+ for {
+ var field string
+ if i := strings.IndexByte(path, '.'); i >= 0 {
+ field, path = path[:i], path[i:]
+ } else {
+ field, path = path, ""
+ }
+
+ if !f(field) {
+ return false
+ }
+
+ if len(path) == 0 {
+ return true
+ }
+ path = strings.TrimPrefix(path, ".")
+ }
+}
+
+func (x *FieldMask) Reset() {
+ *x = FieldMask{}
+ if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled {
+ mi := &file_google_protobuf_field_mask_proto_msgTypes[0]
+ ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
+ ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
+ }
+}
+
+func (x *FieldMask) String() string {
+ return protoimpl.X.MessageStringOf(x)
+}
+
+func (*FieldMask) ProtoMessage() {}
+
+func (x *FieldMask) ProtoReflect() protoreflect.Message {
+ mi := &file_google_protobuf_field_mask_proto_msgTypes[0]
+ if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled && x != nil {
+ ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
+ if ms.LoadMessageInfo() == nil {
+ ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
+ }
+ return ms
+ }
+ return mi.MessageOf(x)
+}
+
+// Deprecated: Use FieldMask.ProtoReflect.Descriptor instead.
+func (*FieldMask) Descriptor() ([]byte, []int) {
+ return file_google_protobuf_field_mask_proto_rawDescGZIP(), []int{0}
+}
+
+func (x *FieldMask) GetPaths() []string {
+ if x != nil {
+ return x.Paths
+ }
+ return nil
+}
+
+var File_google_protobuf_field_mask_proto protoreflect.FileDescriptor
+
+var file_google_protobuf_field_mask_proto_rawDesc = []byte{
+ 0x0a, 0x20, 0x67, 0x6f, 0x6f, 0x67, 0x6c, 0x65, 0x2f, 0x70, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x62, 0x75,
+ 0x66, 0x2f, 0x66, 0x69, 0x65, 0x6c, 0x64, 0x5f, 0x6d, 0x61, 0x73, 0x6b, 0x2e, 0x70, 0x72, 0x6f,
+ 0x74, 0x6f, 0x12, 0x0f, 0x67, 0x6f, 0x6f, 0x67, 0x6c, 0x65, 0x2e, 0x70, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f,
+ 0x62, 0x75, 0x66, 0x22, 0x21, 0x0a, 0x09, 0x46, 0x69, 0x65, 0x6c, 0x64, 0x4d, 0x61, 0x73, 0x6b,
+ 0x12, 0x14, 0x0a, 0x05, 0x70, 0x61, 0x74, 0x68, 0x73, 0x18, 0x01, 0x20, 0x03, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52,
+ 0x05, 0x70, 0x61, 0x74, 0x68, 0x73, 0x42, 0x85, 0x01, 0x0a, 0x13, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6d, 0x2e, 0x67,
+ 0x6f, 0x6f, 0x67, 0x6c, 0x65, 0x2e, 0x70, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x62, 0x75, 0x66, 0x42, 0x0e,
+ 0x46, 0x69, 0x65, 0x6c, 0x64, 0x4d, 0x61, 0x73, 0x6b, 0x50, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x50, 0x01,
+ 0x5a, 0x32, 0x67, 0x6f, 0x6f, 0x67, 0x6c, 0x65, 0x2e, 0x67, 0x6f, 0x6c, 0x61, 0x6e, 0x67, 0x2e,
+ 0x6f, 0x72, 0x67, 0x2f, 0x70, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x62, 0x75, 0x66, 0x2f, 0x74, 0x79, 0x70,
+ 0x65, 0x73, 0x2f, 0x6b, 0x6e, 0x6f, 0x77, 0x6e, 0x2f, 0x66, 0x69, 0x65, 0x6c, 0x64, 0x6d, 0x61,
+ 0x73, 0x6b, 0x70, 0x62, 0xf8, 0x01, 0x01, 0xa2, 0x02, 0x03, 0x47, 0x50, 0x42, 0xaa, 0x02, 0x1e,
+ 0x47, 0x6f, 0x6f, 0x67, 0x6c, 0x65, 0x2e, 0x50, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x62, 0x75, 0x66, 0x2e,
+ 0x57, 0x65, 0x6c, 0x6c, 0x4b, 0x6e, 0x6f, 0x77, 0x6e, 0x54, 0x79, 0x70, 0x65, 0x73, 0x62, 0x06,
+ 0x70, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x33,
+}
+
+var (
+ file_google_protobuf_field_mask_proto_rawDescOnce sync.Once
+ file_google_protobuf_field_mask_proto_rawDescData = file_google_protobuf_field_mask_proto_rawDesc
+)
+
+func file_google_protobuf_field_mask_proto_rawDescGZIP() []byte {
+ file_google_protobuf_field_mask_proto_rawDescOnce.Do(func() {
+ file_google_protobuf_field_mask_proto_rawDescData = protoimpl.X.CompressGZIP(file_google_protobuf_field_mask_proto_rawDescData)
+ })
+ return file_google_protobuf_field_mask_proto_rawDescData
+}
+
+var file_google_protobuf_field_mask_proto_msgTypes = make([]protoimpl.MessageInfo, 1)
+var file_google_protobuf_field_mask_proto_goTypes = []interface{}{
+ (*FieldMask)(nil), // 0: google.protobuf.FieldMask
+}
+var file_google_protobuf_field_mask_proto_depIdxs = []int32{
+ 0, // [0:0] is the sub-list for method output_type
+ 0, // [0:0] is the sub-list for method input_type
+ 0, // [0:0] is the sub-list for extension type_name
+ 0, // [0:0] is the sub-list for extension extendee
+ 0, // [0:0] is the sub-list for field type_name
+}
+
+func init() { file_google_protobuf_field_mask_proto_init() }
+func file_google_protobuf_field_mask_proto_init() {
+ if File_google_protobuf_field_mask_proto != nil {
+ return
+ }
+ if !protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled {
+ file_google_protobuf_field_mask_proto_msgTypes[0].Exporter = func(v interface{}, i int) interface{} {
+ switch v := v.(*FieldMask); i {
+ case 0:
+ return &v.state
+ case 1:
+ return &v.sizeCache
+ case 2:
+ return &v.unknownFields
+ default:
+ return nil
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ type x struct{}
+ out := protoimpl.TypeBuilder{
+ File: protoimpl.DescBuilder{
+ GoPackagePath: reflect.TypeOf(x{}).PkgPath(),
+ RawDescriptor: file_google_protobuf_field_mask_proto_rawDesc,
+ NumEnums: 0,
+ NumMessages: 1,
+ NumExtensions: 0,
+ NumServices: 0,
+ },
+ GoTypes: file_google_protobuf_field_mask_proto_goTypes,
+ DependencyIndexes: file_google_protobuf_field_mask_proto_depIdxs,
+ MessageInfos: file_google_protobuf_field_mask_proto_msgTypes,
+ }.Build()
+ File_google_protobuf_field_mask_proto = out.File
+ file_google_protobuf_field_mask_proto_rawDesc = nil
+ file_google_protobuf_field_mask_proto_goTypes = nil
+ file_google_protobuf_field_mask_proto_depIdxs = nil
+}