commit | 032d3307fb72066fbdfb8b5b2cdf010c649876d8 | [log] [tgz] |
---|---|---|
author | khenaidoo <knursimu@ciena.com> | Fri Jun 09 14:50:04 2017 -0400 |
committer | Sergio Slobodrian <sslobodr@ciena.com> | Mon Jun 12 06:37:05 2017 -0700 |
tree | 36c8bf11cf3add1a8c2a76d362fc8c9ae92a89ae | |
parent | d24189ec6bb130c4d517a31ceb9864a64c83a4de [diff] |
[ 4222 ] Minor changes after code review This is the initial commit for Persistence and Voltha restart. It consists of the following: 1) Introduction of a store config id which represents the data of a Voltha instance. 2) The Coordinator service dynamically allocates a store config id to each voltha instance on startup. It also reallocates the same id to another voltha instance in the event the previous voltha instance with that store id went down. 3) All voltha data is stored in Consul as KV 4) When a Voltha instance is started and get allocated a config id that refers to existing data (from an instance that went down), then it will load all the data from Consul into its own memory and start a reconciliation process. 5) During the reconciliation process, the necessary agents and callbacks are created as per the data. A reconcile() API is also invoked on the adapters to perform their side of the reconciliation. 6) The Reconciliation process is implemented in ponsim OLT and ONU 7) A set of integration tests focussed on persistence and voltha restarts. 8) Fix a few bugs along the way Change-Id: I8c2bbae3b2fc79d0afd8ce3b7b0be6bde93e492a
Voltha aims to provide a layer of abstraction on top of legacy and next generation access network equipment for the purpose of control and management. Its initial focus is on PON (GPON, EPON, NG PON 2), but it aims to go beyond to eventually cover other access technologies (xDSL, Docsis, G.FAST, dedicated Ethernet, fixed wireless).
Key concepts of Voltha:
Control and management in the access network space is a mess. Each access technology brings its own bag of protocols, and on top of that vendors have their own interpretation/extension of the same standards. Compounding the problem is that these vendor- and technology specific differences ooze way up into the centralized OSS systems of the service provider, creating a lot of inefficiencies.
Ideally, all vendor equipment for the same access technology should provide an identical interface for control and management. Moreover, there shall be much higher synergies across technologies. While we wait for vendors to unite, Voltha provides an increment to that direction, by confining the differences to the locality of access and hiding them from the upper layers of the OSS stack.
While we are still at the early phase of development, you can check out the BUILD.md file to see how you can build it, run it, test it, etc.
Contributions, small and large, are welcome. Minor contributions and bug fixes are always welcome in form of pull requests. For larger work, the best is to check in with the existing developers to see where help is most needed and to make sure your solution is compatible with the general philosophy of Voltha.