commit | 656ecc6676367d7483667550fa91046d7a8c0719 | [log] [tgz] |
---|---|---|
author | Zsolt Haraszti <zharaszt@ciena.com> | Wed Dec 28 15:08:23 2016 -0800 |
committer | Zsolt Haraszti <zharaszt@ciena.com> | Thu Dec 29 00:15:43 2016 -0800 |
tree | 4f934b1feda7c7032da3a62d09f4e101929ff5fa | |
parent | 313c4be4cfc0b0e1bb2551efed6489333b195bfb [diff] |
PONSIM: PON simulator with real dataplane handling This was needed because neither CPQD nor OVS can handle both zero-tagged packets and 802.1ad (QinQ). - extensive unittest proves ponsim functional correctness (for the common use-cases needed in the PON scenario) - integrated with frameio and coupled with a rather simple gRPC NBI, ponsim can be operated from Voltha just like a real PON system - posim_olt/_onu adapters added to Voltha to work on ponsim - CLI can be used to preprovision and activate a PONSIM instance (e.g., preprovision_olt -t ponsim_olt -H localhost:50060) - Some of olt-oftest:olt-complex testcases can be run on the ponsim device (in vagrant/Ubuntu environment), but there are some remaining issues to work out: - barrier calls in OF do not guaranty that the flow is already installed on the device. This is a generic issue, not just for ponsim. - the whole test framework is inconsistent about zero- tagged vs. untagged frames at the ONUs, while ponsim is rather pedantica and does exactly what was defined in the flows. Change-Id: I0dd564c932416ae1566935492134cb5b08113bdc
Voltha aims to provide a layer of abstraction on top of legacy and next generation access network equipment for the purpose of control and management. Its initial focus is on PON (GPON, EPON, NG PON 2), but it aims to go beyond to eventually cover other access technologies (xDSL, Docsis, G.FAST, dedicated Ethernet, fixed wireless).
Key concepts of Voltha:
Control and management in the access network space is a mess. Each access technology brings its own bag of protocols, and on top of that vendors have their own interpretation/extension of the same standards. Compounding the problem is that these vendor- and technology specific differences ooze way up into the centralized OSS systems of the service provider, creating a lot of inefficiencies.
Ideally, all vendor equipment for the same access technology should provide an identical interface for control and management. Moreover, there shall be much higher synergies across technologies. While we wait for vendors to unite, Voltha provides an increment to that direction, by confining the differences to the locality of access and hiding them from the upper layers of the OSS stack.
While we are still at the early phase of development, you can check out the BUILD.md file to see how you can build it, run it, test it, etc.
Contributions, small and large, are welcome. Minor contributions and bug fixes are always welcome in form of pull requests. For larger work, the best is to check in with the existing developers to see where help is most needed and to make sure your solution is compatible with the general philosophy of Voltha.