protos/http.proto

// Copyright 2018 Google LLC
// Modififications (C) 2018, Open Networking Foundation
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
//
//     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
//
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.

// NOTE: On the provenance of and modifications to http.proto and
// annotations.proto
//
// TL;DR: The files http.proto and annotations.proto are originally from here:
//  https://github.com/googleapis/googleapis
// They have been modified slightly to avoid a namespace conflict.
//
// Long winded explanation:
// These files are designed to interact with Google's first party API's, and
// the recommended way to use them is to compiled them to code with protoc and
// included in your codebase before being used.  Due to the fact that we're not
// using them that way, and because of how Chameleon and XOS work (dynamically
// defining our own API's), we have to ship these *.proto files as a part of
// our artifacts.
//
// The problems start when you try to include these specific .proto files in
// python. The protoc compiler includes the `google.protobuf` classes, which
// python can look up in the standard python library path. Unfortunately these
// files are namespaced with `google.api` in the path and aren't shipped with
// protoc.  This leads to a path conflict - you can't have two library paths
// start with the same path component (`google` in this case) without getting
// an "ImportError: No module named ..." on one of the paths when you import
// them.
//
// Historically, various confusing hacks were implemented to override and
// special-case the python `include` directive to include a file at a different
// path than was specified. These hacks also failed when updating the base OS,
// and would likely continue to fail in other, stranger ways as we update the
// codebase.  Specifically, Python 3 reimplemented these features in the
// importlib section of the standard library, so there's little confidence our
// hacks would continue to work.  As an aside, there are various protobuf
// `options` statements to deal with this sort of issue in other languages (see
// the `go_package` and `java_package` below ) but these don't currently exist
// for python: https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/973
//
// To avoid this entire psychotic namespace hellscape, it's much easier to
// modify these files to remove the google.api path component, and have them
// included directly at a path of our own choice.

syntax = "proto3";

package googleapi;

option cc_enable_arenas = true;
option go_package = "google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/api/annotations;annotations";
option java_multiple_files = true;
option java_outer_classname = "HttpProto";
option java_package = "com.google.api";
option objc_class_prefix = "GAPI";


// Defines the HTTP configuration for an API service. It contains a list of
// [HttpRule][google.api.HttpRule], each specifying the mapping of an RPC method
// to one or more HTTP REST API methods.
message Http {
  // A list of HTTP configuration rules that apply to individual API methods.
  //
  // **NOTE:** All service configuration rules follow "last one wins" order.
  repeated HttpRule rules = 1;

  // When set to true, URL path parmeters will be fully URI-decoded except in
  // cases of single segment matches in reserved expansion, where "%2F" will be
  // left encoded.
  //
  // The default behavior is to not decode RFC 6570 reserved characters in multi
  // segment matches.
  bool fully_decode_reserved_expansion = 2;
}

// `HttpRule` defines the mapping of an RPC method to one or more HTTP
// REST API methods. The mapping specifies how different portions of the RPC
// request message are mapped to URL path, URL query parameters, and
// HTTP request body. The mapping is typically specified as an
// `google.api.http` annotation on the RPC method,
// see "google/api/annotations.proto" for details.
//
// The mapping consists of a field specifying the path template and
// method kind.  The path template can refer to fields in the request
// message, as in the example below which describes a REST GET
// operation on a resource collection of messages:
//
//
//     service Messaging {
//       rpc GetMessage(GetMessageRequest) returns (Message) {
//         option (google.api.http).get = "/v1/messages/{message_id}/{sub.subfield}";
//       }
//     }
//     message GetMessageRequest {
//       message SubMessage {
//         string subfield = 1;
//       }
//       string message_id = 1; // mapped to the URL
//       SubMessage sub = 2;    // `sub.subfield` is url-mapped
//     }
//     message Message {
//       string text = 1; // content of the resource
//     }
//
// The same http annotation can alternatively be expressed inside the
// `GRPC API Configuration` YAML file.
//
//     http:
//       rules:
//         - selector: <proto_package_name>.Messaging.GetMessage
//           get: /v1/messages/{message_id}/{sub.subfield}
//
// This definition enables an automatic, bidrectional mapping of HTTP
// JSON to RPC. Example:
//
// HTTP | RPC
// -----|-----
// `GET /v1/messages/123456/foo`  | `GetMessage(message_id: "123456" sub: SubMessage(subfield: "foo"))`
//
// In general, not only fields but also field paths can be referenced
// from a path pattern. Fields mapped to the path pattern cannot be
// repeated and must have a primitive (non-message) type.
//
// Any fields in the request message which are not bound by the path
// pattern automatically become (optional) HTTP query
// parameters. Assume the following definition of the request message:
//
//
//     service Messaging {
//       rpc GetMessage(GetMessageRequest) returns (Message) {
//         option (google.api.http).get = "/v1/messages/{message_id}";
//       }
//     }
//     message GetMessageRequest {
//       message SubMessage {
//         string subfield = 1;
//       }
//       string message_id = 1; // mapped to the URL
//       int64 revision = 2;    // becomes a parameter
//       SubMessage sub = 3;    // `sub.subfield` becomes a parameter
//     }
//
//
// This enables a HTTP JSON to RPC mapping as below:
//
// HTTP | RPC
// -----|-----
// `GET /v1/messages/123456?revision=2&sub.subfield=foo` | `GetMessage(message_id: "123456" revision: 2 sub: SubMessage(subfield: "foo"))`
//
// Note that fields which are mapped to HTTP parameters must have a
// primitive type or a repeated primitive type. Message types are not
// allowed. In the case of a repeated type, the parameter can be
// repeated in the URL, as in `...?param=A&param=B`.
//
// For HTTP method kinds which allow a request body, the `body` field
// specifies the mapping. Consider a REST update method on the
// message resource collection:
//
//
//     service Messaging {
//       rpc UpdateMessage(UpdateMessageRequest) returns (Message) {
//         option (google.api.http) = {
//           put: "/v1/messages/{message_id}"
//           body: "message"
//         };
//       }
//     }
//     message UpdateMessageRequest {
//       string message_id = 1; // mapped to the URL
//       Message message = 2;   // mapped to the body
//     }
//
//
// The following HTTP JSON to RPC mapping is enabled, where the
// representation of the JSON in the request body is determined by
// protos JSON encoding:
//
// HTTP | RPC
// -----|-----
// `PUT /v1/messages/123456 { "text": "Hi!" }` | `UpdateMessage(message_id: "123456" message { text: "Hi!" })`
//
// The special name `*` can be used in the body mapping to define that
// every field not bound by the path template should be mapped to the
// request body.  This enables the following alternative definition of
// the update method:
//
//     service Messaging {
//       rpc UpdateMessage(Message) returns (Message) {
//         option (google.api.http) = {
//           put: "/v1/messages/{message_id}"
//           body: "*"
//         };
//       }
//     }
//     message Message {
//       string message_id = 1;
//       string text = 2;
//     }
//
//
// The following HTTP JSON to RPC mapping is enabled:
//
// HTTP | RPC
// -----|-----
// `PUT /v1/messages/123456 { "text": "Hi!" }` | `UpdateMessage(message_id: "123456" text: "Hi!")`
//
// Note that when using `*` in the body mapping, it is not possible to
// have HTTP parameters, as all fields not bound by the path end in
// the body. This makes this option more rarely used in practice of
// defining REST APIs. The common usage of `*` is in custom methods
// which don't use the URL at all for transferring data.
//
// It is possible to define multiple HTTP methods for one RPC by using
// the `additional_bindings` option. Example:
//
//     service Messaging {
//       rpc GetMessage(GetMessageRequest) returns (Message) {
//         option (google.api.http) = {
//           get: "/v1/messages/{message_id}"
//           additional_bindings {
//             get: "/v1/users/{user_id}/messages/{message_id}"
//           }
//         };
//       }
//     }
//     message GetMessageRequest {
//       string message_id = 1;
//       string user_id = 2;
//     }
//
//
// This enables the following two alternative HTTP JSON to RPC
// mappings:
//
// HTTP | RPC
// -----|-----
// `GET /v1/messages/123456` | `GetMessage(message_id: "123456")`
// `GET /v1/users/me/messages/123456` | `GetMessage(user_id: "me" message_id: "123456")`
//
// # Rules for HTTP mapping
//
// The rules for mapping HTTP path, query parameters, and body fields
// to the request message are as follows:
//
// 1. The `body` field specifies either `*` or a field path, or is
//    omitted. If omitted, it indicates there is no HTTP request body.
// 2. Leaf fields (recursive expansion of nested messages in the
//    request) can be classified into three types:
//     (a) Matched in the URL template.
//     (b) Covered by body (if body is `*`, everything except (a) fields;
//         else everything under the body field)
//     (c) All other fields.
// 3. URL query parameters found in the HTTP request are mapped to (c) fields.
// 4. Any body sent with an HTTP request can contain only (b) fields.
//
// The syntax of the path template is as follows:
//
//     Template = "/" Segments [ Verb ] ;
//     Segments = Segment { "/" Segment } ;
//     Segment  = "*" | "**" | LITERAL | Variable ;
//     Variable = "{" FieldPath [ "=" Segments ] "}" ;
//     FieldPath = IDENT { "." IDENT } ;
//     Verb     = ":" LITERAL ;
//
// The syntax `*` matches a single path segment. The syntax `**` matches zero
// or more path segments, which must be the last part of the path except the
// `Verb`. The syntax `LITERAL` matches literal text in the path.
//
// The syntax `Variable` matches part of the URL path as specified by its
// template. A variable template must not contain other variables. If a variable
// matches a single path segment, its template may be omitted, e.g. `{var}`
// is equivalent to `{var=*}`.
//
// If a variable contains exactly one path segment, such as `"{var}"` or
// `"{var=*}"`, when such a variable is expanded into a URL path, all characters
// except `[-_.~0-9a-zA-Z]` are percent-encoded. Such variables show up in the
// Discovery Document as `{var}`.
//
// If a variable contains one or more path segments, such as `"{var=foo/*}"`
// or `"{var=**}"`, when such a variable is expanded into a URL path, all
// characters except `[-_.~/0-9a-zA-Z]` are percent-encoded. Such variables
// show up in the Discovery Document as `{+var}`.
//
// NOTE: While the single segment variable matches the semantics of
// [RFC 6570](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6570) Section 3.2.2
// Simple String Expansion, the multi segment variable **does not** match
// RFC 6570 Reserved Expansion. The reason is that the Reserved Expansion
// does not expand special characters like `?` and `#`, which would lead
// to invalid URLs.
//
// NOTE: the field paths in variables and in the `body` must not refer to
// repeated fields or map fields.
message HttpRule {
  // Selects methods to which this rule applies.
  //
  // Refer to [selector][google.api.DocumentationRule.selector] for syntax details.
  string selector = 1;

  // Determines the URL pattern is matched by this rules. This pattern can be
  // used with any of the {get|put|post|delete|patch} methods. A custom method
  // can be defined using the 'custom' field.
  oneof pattern {
    // Used for listing and getting information about resources.
    string get = 2;

    // Used for updating a resource.
    string put = 3;

    // Used for creating a resource.
    string post = 4;

    // Used for deleting a resource.
    string delete = 5;

    // Used for updating a resource.
    string patch = 6;

    // The custom pattern is used for specifying an HTTP method that is not
    // included in the `pattern` field, such as HEAD, or "*" to leave the
    // HTTP method unspecified for this rule. The wild-card rule is useful
    // for services that provide content to Web (HTML) clients.
    CustomHttpPattern custom = 8;
  }

  // The name of the request field whose value is mapped to the HTTP body, or
  // `*` for mapping all fields not captured by the path pattern to the HTTP
  // body. NOTE: the referred field must not be a repeated field and must be
  // present at the top-level of request message type.
  string body = 7;

  // Additional HTTP bindings for the selector. Nested bindings must
  // not contain an `additional_bindings` field themselves (that is,
  // the nesting may only be one level deep).
  repeated HttpRule additional_bindings = 11;
}

// A custom pattern is used for defining custom HTTP verb.
message CustomHttpPattern {
  // The name of this custom HTTP verb.
  string kind = 1;

  // The path matched by this custom verb.
  string path = 2;
}