Gitiles
Code Review Sign In
gerrit.opencord.org / quagga / 6a48343cd6e392a3ae48dbb735008f911e60420d / . / doc / next-hop-tracking.txt
blob: d157866e8a76243e9980a5a7a8bfa016e28ce213 [file] [log] [blame]
0. Introduction
This is the design specification for next hop tracking feature in
Quagga.
1. Background
Recursive routes are of the form:
p/m --> n
[Ex: 1.1.0.0/16 --> 2.2.2.2]
where 'n' itself is resolved through another route as follows:
p2/m --> h, interface
[Ex: 2.2.2.0/24 --> 3.3.3.3, eth0]
Usually, BGP routes are recursive in nature and BGP nexthops get
resolved through an IGP route. IGP usually adds its routes pointing to
an interface (these are called non-recursive routes).
When BGP receives a recursive route from a peer, it needs to validate
the nexthop. The path is marked valid or invalid based on the
reachability status of the nexthop. Nexthop validation is also
important for BGP decision process as the metric to reach the nexthop
is a parameter to best path selection process.
As it goes with routing, this is a dynamic process. Route to the
nexthop can change. The nexthop can become unreachable or
reachable. In the current BGP implementation, the nexthop validation
is done periodically in the scanner run. The default scanner run
interval is one minute. Every minute, the scanner task walks the
entire BGP table. It checks the validity of each nexthop with Zebra
(the routing table manager) through a request and response message
exchange between BGP and Zebra process. BGP process is blocked for
that duration. The mechanism has two major drawbacks:
(1) The scanner task runs to completion. That can potentially starve
the other tasks for long periods of time, based on the BGP table
size and number of nexthops.
(2) Convergence around routing changes that affect the nexthops can be
long (around a minute with the default intervals). The interval
can be shortened to achieve faster reaction time, but it makes the
first problem worse, with the scanner task consuming most of the
CPU resources.
"Next hop tracking" feature makes this process event-driven. It
eliminates periodic nexthop validation and introduces an asynchronous
communication path between BGP and Zebra for route change notifications
that can then be acted upon.
2. Goal
Stating the obvious, the main goal is to remove the two limitations we
discussed in the previous section. The goals, in a constructive tone,
are the following:
- fairness: the scanner run should not consume an unjustly high amount
of CPU time. This should give an overall good performance and
response time to other events (route changes, session events,
IO/user interface).
- convergence: BGP must react to nexthop changes instantly and provide
sub-second convergence. This may involve diverting the routes from
one nexthop to another.
3. Overview of the changes
The changes are in both BGP and Zebra modules. The short summary is
the following:
- Zebra implements a registration mechanism by which clients can
register for next hop notification. Consequently, it maintains a
separate table, per (VRF, AF) pair, of next hops and interested
client-list per next hop.
- When the main routing table changes in Zebra, it evaluates the next
hop table: for each next hop, it checks if the route table
modifications have changed its state. If so, it notifies the
interested clients.
- BGP is one such client. It registers the next hops corresponding to
all of its received routes/paths. It also threads the paths against
each nexthop structure.
- When BGP receives a next hop notification from Zebra, it walks the
corresponding path list. It makes them valid or invalid depending
on the next hop notification. It then re-computes best path for the
corresponding destination. This may result in re-announcing those
destinations to peers.
4. Design
4.1. Modules
The core design introduces an "nht" (next hop tracking) module in BGP
and "rnh" (recursive nexthop) module in Zebra. The "nht" module
provides the following APIs:
bgp_find_or_add_nexthop() : find or add a nexthop in BGP nexthop table
bgp_find_nexthop() : find a nexthop in BGP nexthop table
bgp_parse_nexthop_update() : parse a nexthop update message coming
from zebra
The "rnh" module provides the following APIs:
zebra_add_rnh() : add a recursive nexthop
zebra_delete_rnh() : delete a recursive nexthop
zebra_lookup_rnh() : lookup a recursive nexthop
zebra_add_rnh_client() : register a client for nexthop notifications
against a recursive nexthop
zebra_remove_rnh_client(): remove the client registration for a
recursive nexthop
zebra_evaluate_rnh_table(): (re)evaluate the recursive nexthop table
(most probably because the main routing
table has changed).
zebra_cleanup_rnh_client(): Cleanup a client from the "rnh" module
data structures (most probably because the
client is going away).
4.2. Control flow
The next hop registration control flow is the following:
<==== BGP Process ====>|<==== Zebra Process ====>
|
receive module nht module | zserv module rnh module
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| | |
bgp_update_ | | |
main() | bgp_find_or_add_ | |
| nexthop() | |
| | |
| | zserv_nexthop_ |
| | register() |
| | | zebra_add_rnh()
| | |
The next hop notification control flow is the following:
<==== Zebra Process ====>|<==== BGP Process ====>
|
rib module rnh module | zebra module nht module
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| | |
meta_queue_ | | |
process() | zebra_evaluate_ | |
| rnh_table() | |
| | |
| | bgp_read_nexthop_ |
| | update() |
| | | bgp_parse_
| | | nexthop_update()
| | |
4.3. zclient message format
ZEBRA_NEXTHOP_REGISTER and ZEBRA_NEXTHOP_UNREGISTER messages are
encoded in the following way:
/*
* 0 1 2 3
* 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
* +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
* | AF | prefix len |
* +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
* . Nexthop prefix .
* . .
* +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
* . .
* . .
* +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
* | AF | prefix len |
* +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
* . Nexthop prefix .
* . .
* +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
*/
ZEBRA_NEXTHOP_UPDATE message is encoded as follows:
/*
* 0 1 2 3
* 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
* +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
* | AF | prefix len |
* +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
* . Nexthop prefix getting resolved .
* . .
* +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
* | metric |
* +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
* | #nexthops |
* +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
* | nexthop type |
* +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
* . resolving Nexthop details .
* . .
* +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
* . .
* +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
* | nexthop type |
* +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
* . resolving Nexthop details .
* +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
*/
4.4. BGP data structure
Legend:
/\ struct bgp_node: a BGP destination/route/prefix
\/
[ ] struct bgp_info: a BGP path (e.g. route received from a peer)
_
(_) struct bgp_nexthop_cache: a BGP nexthop
/\ NULL
\/--+ ^
| :
+--[ ]--[ ]--[ ]--> NULL
/\ :
\/--+ :
| :
+--[ ]--[ ]--> NULL
:
_ :
(_).............
4.5. Zebra data structure
rnh table:
O
/ \
O O
/ \
O O
struct rnh
{
u_char flags;
struct rib *state;
struct list *client_list;
struct route_node *node;
};
5. User interface changes
quagga# show ip nht
3.3.3.3
resolved via kernel
via 11.0.0.6, swp1
Client list: bgp(fd 12)
11.0.0.10
resolved via connected
is directly connected, swp2
Client list: bgp(fd 12)
11.0.0.18
resolved via connected
is directly connected, swp4
Client list: bgp(fd 12)
11.11.11.11
resolved via kernel
via 10.0.1.2, eth0
Client list: bgp(fd 12)
quagga# show ip bgp nexthop
Current BGP nexthop cache:
3.3.3.3 valid [IGP metric 0], #paths 3
Last update: Wed Oct 16 04:43:49 2013
11.0.0.10 valid [IGP metric 1], #paths 1
Last update: Wed Oct 16 04:43:51 2013
11.0.0.18 valid [IGP metric 1], #paths 2
Last update: Wed Oct 16 04:43:47 2013
11.11.11.11 valid [IGP metric 0], #paths 1
Last update: Wed Oct 16 04:43:47 2013
quagga# show ipv6 nht
quagga# show ip bgp nexthop detail
quagga# debug bgp nht
quagga# debug zebra nht
6. Sample test cases
r2----r3
/ \ /
r1----r4
- Verify that a change in IGP cost triggers NHT
+ shutdown the r1-r4 and r2-r4 links
+ no shut the r1-r4 and r2-r4 links and wait for OSPF to come back
up
+ We should be back to the original nexthop via r4 now
- Verify that a NH becoming unreachable triggers NHT
+ Shutdown all links to r4
- Verify that a NH becoming reachable triggers NHT
+ no shut all links to r4
7. Future work
- route-policy for next hop validation (e.g. ignore default route)
- damping for rapid next hop changes
- prioritized handling of nexthop changes ((un)reachability vs. metric
changes)
- handling recursion loop, e.g.
11.11.11.11/32 -> 12.12.12.12
12.12.12.12/32 -> 11.11.11.11
11.0.0.0/8 -> <interface>
- better statistics