blob: 782e332a4da76e4945ed727f97f753187bd460fd [file] [log] [blame]
paul7d7ddde2003-02-03 16:31:16 +00001----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * -----
2Changes 2002.12.20
3
41. Bug fixes
5
6 1.1 When an opaque LSA is being removed from (or added to) the LSDB,
7 it does not mean a change in network topology. Therefore, SPF
8 recalculation should not be triggered in that case.
9 There was an assertion failure problem "assert (rn && rn->info)"
10 inside the function "ospf_ase_incremental_update()", because
11 the upper function "ospf_lsa_maxage_walker_remover()" called it
12 when a type-11 opaque LSA is removed due to MaxAge.
13
14 1.2 Type-9 LSA is defined to have "link-local" flooding scope.
15 In the Database exchange procedure with a new neighbor, a type-9
16 LSA was added in the database summary of a DD message, even if
17 the link is different from the one that have bound to.
18
192. Feature enhancements
20
21 2.1 Though a "wildcard" concept to handle type-9/10/11 LSAs altogether
22 has introduced about a year ago, it was only a symbol definition
23 and actual handling mechanism was not implemented. Now it works.
24
25----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * -----
26Changes 2002.7.8
27
281. Bug fixes
29
30 1.1 When "ospf_delete_opaque_functab()" is called, internal structure
31 "oipt" remain unfreed. If register/delete functab is repeated,
32 illegal memory access happens due to this "oipt".
33
34 1.2 In "free_opaque_info_per_id()", there was a crucial typo which
35 ignores a condition test.
36
37 "if (oipi->lsa != NULL);" <-- semicolon!
38
392. Feature enhancements
40
41 None.
42
43----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * -----
44Changes 2001.12.03
45
461. Bug fixes
47
48 1.1 Though a new member "oi" has added to "struct ospf_lsa" to control
49 flooding scope of type-9 Opaque-LSAs, the value was always NULL
50 because no one set it.
51
52 1.2 In the function "show_ip_ospf_database_summary()" and "show_lsa_
53 detail_adv_router()", VTY output for type-11 Opaque-LSAs did not
54 work properly.
55
56 1.3 URL for the opaque-type assignment reference has changed.
57
58 1.4 In the file "ospf_mpls_te.c", printf formats have changed to
59 avoid compiler warning messages; "%lu" -> "%u", "%lx" -> "%x".
60 Note that this hack depends on OS, compiler and their versions.
61
62 1.5 One of attached documentation "opaque_lsa.txt" has changed to
63 reflect the latest coding.
64
652. Feature enhancements
66
67 2.1 Knowing that it is an ugly hack, an "officially unallocated"
68 opaque-type value 0 has newly introduced as a "wildcard",
69 which matches to all opaque-type.
70 This value must not be flooded to the network, of course.
71
72 2.2 The Opaque-core module makes use of newly introduced hooks to
73 dispatch every LSDB change (LSA installation and deletion) to
74 preregistered opaque users.
75 Therefore, by providing appropriate callback functions as new
76 parameters of "ospf_register_opaque_functab()", an opaque user
77 can refer to every LSA instance to be installed into, or to be
78 deleted from, the LSDB.
79
80----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * -----
81Changes 2001.10.31
82
831. Bug fixes
84
85 1.1 Since each LSA has their own lifetime, they will remain in a
86 routing domain (being stored in LSDB of each router), until their
87 age naturally reach to MaxAge or explicitly being flushed by the
88 originated router. Therefore, if a router restarted with a short
89 downtime, it is possible that previously flooded self-originated
90 LSAs might received if the NSM status is not less than Exchange.
91
92 There were some problems in the way of handling self-originated
93 Opaque-LSAs if they are contained in a received LSUpd message,
94 but not installed to the local LSDB yet.
95 Regardless of some conditions to start originating Opaque-LSAs
96 (there should be at least one opaque-capable full-state neighbor),
97 the function "ospf_flood()" will be called to flood and install
98 this brand-new looking LSA.
99 As the result, when the NSM of an opaque-capable neighbor gets
100 full, internal state inconsistency happens; a user of Opaque-LSA
101 such as MPLS-TE can refer to self-originated LSAs in the local
102 LSDB, but cannot modify their contents...
103
104 Above problems have fixed with a policy "flush it from the whole
105 routing domain and keep silent until the flushing completed".
106 By using this sweeping technique, we can be free from confusion
107 caused by self-originated LSAs received via network.
108
109 1.2 The function "ospf_opaque_type_name()" contained massive ifdefs
110 corresponding to each "opaque-type".
111 These unnecessary ifdefs are removed completely.
112
113 1.3 In the function "ospf_delete_opaque_functab()", there was an
114 improper loop control that causes illegal memory access.
115 Original coding was "next = nextnode (node)".
116
117 1.4 The function "ospf_mpls_te_ism_change()" could not handle the
118 case when the ISM changes from Waiting to DR/BDR/Other.
119 So, there was a case that even if one of an ISM become
120 operational and MPLS-TE module has started, the corresponding
121 Opaque-LSA cannot be originated.
122
123 1.5 The function "ospf_opaque_lsa_reoriginate_schedule()" did not
124 allow to be called multiple times, simply because handling
125 module for the given "lsa-type & opaque-type" already exists.
126 But this assumption seems to be wrong.
127 Change the policy to allow this function to be called multiple
128 times and let the caller to decide what should do when the
129 corresponding callback function "(* functab->lsa_originator)()"
130 is called.
131
1322. Feature enhancements
133
134 2.1 The global bitmap "opaque" has introduced instead of former flag
135 "OpaqueCapable", to store complex conditions to handle Opaque-LSAs.
136
137 2.2 The MPLS-TE module now referes to "draft-katz-yeung-ospf-traffic
138 -06.txt", no significant changes with 05 version, though.
139
140----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * -----
141Changes 2001.08.03
142
1431. Bug fixes
144
145 1.1 Even if the ospfd started with opaque capability enabled, when
146 the ospfd receives an unknown opaque-type (unregistered by the
147 function "ospf_register_opaque_functab()" beforehand), the LSA
148 was discarded. As the result, only the opaque-LSAs that have
149 commonly registered by opaque-capable ospf routers can be
150 flooded in a routing domain.
151
152 This behavior has fixed so that arbitrary opaque-type LSAs can
153 be flooded among opaque-capable ospf routers.
154 If the ospfd has opaque-LSA capability but disabled at runtime,
155 received opaque-LSAs can be accepted and registered to LSDB as
156 is, but not be flooded to the network; those opaque LSAs will
157 remain in LSDB until explicitly flushed by incoming LSUpd
158 messages with MaxAge, or their age naturally reaches to MaxAge.
159
160 1.2 The function "ospf_register_opaque_functab()" did not check
161 if the entry corresponding to the given "lsa-type, opaque-type"
162 combination already exists or not.
163 This problem has fixed not to allow multiple registration.
164
165 1.3 Since type-11 (AS external) LSAs will be flooded beyond areas,
166 there is little relationship between "struct lsa" and "struct
167 area". More specifically, the pointer address "lsa->area" can
168 be NULL if the lsa-type is 11, thus an illegal memory access
169 will happen. This problem has fixed.
170
171 1.4 When self-originated opaque-LSAs are received via network and
172 if the corresponding opaque-type functions are not available
173 (they have already deleted) at that time, those LSAs were
174 dropped due to "unknown opaque-type" error.
175 After the problem 1.1 has fixed, those "self-originated" LSAs
176 were registered to LSDB and then flooded to the network, even
177 if the processing functions did not exist...
178
179 After all, this problem has fixed so that those LSAs should
180 explicitly be flushed from the routing domain immediately, if
181 the processing functions cannot find at that time.
182
183 1.5 Some typo have fixed.
184
185 --- EXAMPLE ---
186 static int
187 opaque_lsa_originate_callback (list funclist, void *lsa_type_dependent)
188 ^^^^^
189 --- EXAMPLE ---
190
1912. Feature enhancements
192
193 2.1 According to the description of rfc2328 in section 10.8, any
194 change in the router's optional capabilities should trigger
195 the option re-negotiation procedures with neighbors.
196
197 --- EXCERPT ---
198 If for some reason the router's optional
199 capabilities change, the Database Exchange procedure should be
200 restarted by reverting to neighbor state ExStart.
201 --- EXCERPT ---
202
203 For the opaque-capability changes, this feature has implemented.
204 More specifically, if "ospf opaque-lsa" or "no ospf opaque-lsa"
205 VTY command is given at runtime, all self-originated LSAs will
206 be flushed immediately and then all neighbor status will be
207 forced to ExStart by generating SeqNumberMismatch events.
208
209 2.1 When we change opaque-capability dynamically (ON -> OFF -> ON),
210 there was no trigger at "OFF->ON" timing to reactivate opaque
211 LSA handling modules (such as MPLS-TE) that have once forcibly
212 stopped at "ON->OFF" timing.
213 Now this dynamic reactivation feature has added.
214
215 2.2 The MPLS-TE module now referes to "draft-katz-yeung-ospf-traffic
216 -05.txt", no significant changes with 04 version, though.
217
218----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * -----
219Changes 2001.03.28
220
221 Initial release of Opaque-LSA/MPLS-TE extensions for the zebra/ospfd.