blob: a0889f0c7a63e614d2f05c8ee86ccd25650555a3 [file] [log] [blame]
khenaidooab1f7bd2019-11-14 14:00:27 -05001// Code generated by protoc-gen-go. DO NOT EDIT.
2// source: google/protobuf/field_mask.proto
3
4package field_mask
5
6import (
7 fmt "fmt"
8 math "math"
9
10 proto "github.com/golang/protobuf/proto"
11)
12
13// Reference imports to suppress errors if they are not otherwise used.
14var _ = proto.Marshal
15var _ = fmt.Errorf
16var _ = math.Inf
17
18// This is a compile-time assertion to ensure that this generated file
19// is compatible with the proto package it is being compiled against.
20// A compilation error at this line likely means your copy of the
21// proto package needs to be updated.
22const _ = proto.ProtoPackageIsVersion3 // please upgrade the proto package
23
24// `FieldMask` represents a set of symbolic field paths, for example:
25//
26// paths: "f.a"
27// paths: "f.b.d"
28//
29// Here `f` represents a field in some root message, `a` and `b`
30// fields in the message found in `f`, and `d` a field found in the
31// message in `f.b`.
32//
33// Field masks are used to specify a subset of fields that should be
34// returned by a get operation or modified by an update operation.
35// Field masks also have a custom JSON encoding (see below).
36//
37// # Field Masks in Projections
38//
39// When used in the context of a projection, a response message or
40// sub-message is filtered by the API to only contain those fields as
41// specified in the mask. For example, if the mask in the previous
42// example is applied to a response message as follows:
43//
44// f {
45// a : 22
46// b {
47// d : 1
48// x : 2
49// }
50// y : 13
51// }
52// z: 8
53//
54// The result will not contain specific values for fields x,y and z
55// (their value will be set to the default, and omitted in proto text
56// output):
57//
58//
59// f {
60// a : 22
61// b {
62// d : 1
63// }
64// }
65//
66// A repeated field is not allowed except at the last position of a
67// paths string.
68//
69// If a FieldMask object is not present in a get operation, the
70// operation applies to all fields (as if a FieldMask of all fields
71// had been specified).
72//
73// Note that a field mask does not necessarily apply to the
74// top-level response message. In case of a REST get operation, the
75// field mask applies directly to the response, but in case of a REST
76// list operation, the mask instead applies to each individual message
77// in the returned resource list. In case of a REST custom method,
78// other definitions may be used. Where the mask applies will be
79// clearly documented together with its declaration in the API. In
80// any case, the effect on the returned resource/resources is required
81// behavior for APIs.
82//
83// # Field Masks in Update Operations
84//
85// A field mask in update operations specifies which fields of the
86// targeted resource are going to be updated. The API is required
87// to only change the values of the fields as specified in the mask
88// and leave the others untouched. If a resource is passed in to
89// describe the updated values, the API ignores the values of all
90// fields not covered by the mask.
91//
92// If a repeated field is specified for an update operation, new values will
93// be appended to the existing repeated field in the target resource. Note that
94// a repeated field is only allowed in the last position of a `paths` string.
95//
96// If a sub-message is specified in the last position of the field mask for an
97// update operation, then new value will be merged into the existing sub-message
98// in the target resource.
99//
100// For example, given the target message:
101//
102// f {
103// b {
104// d: 1
105// x: 2
106// }
107// c: [1]
108// }
109//
110// And an update message:
111//
112// f {
113// b {
114// d: 10
115// }
116// c: [2]
117// }
118//
119// then if the field mask is:
120//
121// paths: ["f.b", "f.c"]
122//
123// then the result will be:
124//
125// f {
126// b {
127// d: 10
128// x: 2
129// }
130// c: [1, 2]
131// }
132//
133// An implementation may provide options to override this default behavior for
134// repeated and message fields.
135//
136// In order to reset a field's value to the default, the field must
137// be in the mask and set to the default value in the provided resource.
138// Hence, in order to reset all fields of a resource, provide a default
139// instance of the resource and set all fields in the mask, or do
140// not provide a mask as described below.
141//
142// If a field mask is not present on update, the operation applies to
143// all fields (as if a field mask of all fields has been specified).
144// Note that in the presence of schema evolution, this may mean that
145// fields the client does not know and has therefore not filled into
146// the request will be reset to their default. If this is unwanted
147// behavior, a specific service may require a client to always specify
148// a field mask, producing an error if not.
149//
150// As with get operations, the location of the resource which
151// describes the updated values in the request message depends on the
152// operation kind. In any case, the effect of the field mask is
153// required to be honored by the API.
154//
155// ## Considerations for HTTP REST
156//
157// The HTTP kind of an update operation which uses a field mask must
158// be set to PATCH instead of PUT in order to satisfy HTTP semantics
159// (PUT must only be used for full updates).
160//
161// # JSON Encoding of Field Masks
162//
163// In JSON, a field mask is encoded as a single string where paths are
164// separated by a comma. Fields name in each path are converted
165// to/from lower-camel naming conventions.
166//
167// As an example, consider the following message declarations:
168//
169// message Profile {
170// User user = 1;
171// Photo photo = 2;
172// }
173// message User {
174// string display_name = 1;
175// string address = 2;
176// }
177//
178// In proto a field mask for `Profile` may look as such:
179//
180// mask {
181// paths: "user.display_name"
182// paths: "photo"
183// }
184//
185// In JSON, the same mask is represented as below:
186//
187// {
188// mask: "user.displayName,photo"
189// }
190//
191// # Field Masks and Oneof Fields
192//
193// Field masks treat fields in oneofs just as regular fields. Consider the
194// following message:
195//
196// message SampleMessage {
197// oneof test_oneof {
198// string name = 4;
199// SubMessage sub_message = 9;
200// }
201// }
202//
203// The field mask can be:
204//
205// mask {
206// paths: "name"
207// }
208//
209// Or:
210//
211// mask {
212// paths: "sub_message"
213// }
214//
215// Note that oneof type names ("test_oneof" in this case) cannot be used in
216// paths.
217//
218// ## Field Mask Verification
219//
220// The implementation of any API method which has a FieldMask type field in the
221// request should verify the included field paths, and return an
222// `INVALID_ARGUMENT` error if any path is duplicated or unmappable.
223type FieldMask struct {
224 // The set of field mask paths.
225 Paths []string `protobuf:"bytes,1,rep,name=paths,proto3" json:"paths,omitempty"`
226 XXX_NoUnkeyedLiteral struct{} `json:"-"`
227 XXX_unrecognized []byte `json:"-"`
228 XXX_sizecache int32 `json:"-"`
229}
230
231func (m *FieldMask) Reset() { *m = FieldMask{} }
232func (m *FieldMask) String() string { return proto.CompactTextString(m) }
233func (*FieldMask) ProtoMessage() {}
234func (*FieldMask) Descriptor() ([]byte, []int) {
235 return fileDescriptor_5158202634f0da48, []int{0}
236}
237
238func (m *FieldMask) XXX_Unmarshal(b []byte) error {
239 return xxx_messageInfo_FieldMask.Unmarshal(m, b)
240}
241func (m *FieldMask) XXX_Marshal(b []byte, deterministic bool) ([]byte, error) {
242 return xxx_messageInfo_FieldMask.Marshal(b, m, deterministic)
243}
244func (m *FieldMask) XXX_Merge(src proto.Message) {
245 xxx_messageInfo_FieldMask.Merge(m, src)
246}
247func (m *FieldMask) XXX_Size() int {
248 return xxx_messageInfo_FieldMask.Size(m)
249}
250func (m *FieldMask) XXX_DiscardUnknown() {
251 xxx_messageInfo_FieldMask.DiscardUnknown(m)
252}
253
254var xxx_messageInfo_FieldMask proto.InternalMessageInfo
255
256func (m *FieldMask) GetPaths() []string {
257 if m != nil {
258 return m.Paths
259 }
260 return nil
261}
262
263func init() {
264 proto.RegisterType((*FieldMask)(nil), "google.protobuf.FieldMask")
265}
266
267func init() { proto.RegisterFile("google/protobuf/field_mask.proto", fileDescriptor_5158202634f0da48) }
268
269var fileDescriptor_5158202634f0da48 = []byte{
270 // 175 bytes of a gzipped FileDescriptorProto
271 0x1f, 0x8b, 0x08, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x02, 0xff, 0xe2, 0x52, 0x48, 0xcf, 0xcf, 0x4f,
272 0xcf, 0x49, 0xd5, 0x2f, 0x28, 0xca, 0x2f, 0xc9, 0x4f, 0x2a, 0x4d, 0xd3, 0x4f, 0xcb, 0x4c, 0xcd,
273 0x49, 0x89, 0xcf, 0x4d, 0x2c, 0xce, 0xd6, 0x03, 0x8b, 0x09, 0xf1, 0x43, 0x54, 0xe8, 0xc1, 0x54,
274 0x28, 0x29, 0x72, 0x71, 0xba, 0x81, 0x14, 0xf9, 0x26, 0x16, 0x67, 0x0b, 0x89, 0x70, 0xb1, 0x16,
275 0x24, 0x96, 0x64, 0x14, 0x4b, 0x30, 0x2a, 0x30, 0x6b, 0x70, 0x06, 0x41, 0x38, 0x4e, 0x3d, 0x8c,
276 0x5c, 0xc2, 0xc9, 0xf9, 0xb9, 0x7a, 0x68, 0x5a, 0x9d, 0xf8, 0xe0, 0x1a, 0x03, 0x40, 0x42, 0x01,
277 0x8c, 0x51, 0x96, 0x50, 0x25, 0xe9, 0xf9, 0x39, 0x89, 0x79, 0xe9, 0x7a, 0xf9, 0x45, 0xe9, 0xfa,
278 0xe9, 0xa9, 0x79, 0x60, 0x0d, 0xd8, 0xdc, 0x64, 0x8d, 0x60, 0xfe, 0x60, 0x64, 0x5c, 0xc4, 0xc4,
279 0xec, 0x1e, 0xe0, 0xb4, 0x8a, 0x49, 0xce, 0x1d, 0x62, 0x48, 0x00, 0x54, 0x83, 0x5e, 0x78, 0x6a,
280 0x4e, 0x8e, 0x77, 0x5e, 0x7e, 0x79, 0x5e, 0x48, 0x65, 0x41, 0x6a, 0x71, 0x12, 0x1b, 0xd8, 0x24,
281 0x63, 0x40, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0xff, 0xff, 0xfd, 0xda, 0xb7, 0xa8, 0xed, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
282}